Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. Summary. In The Differend, based on Immanuel Kant 's views on the separation of Understanding, Judgment, and Reason, Lyotard identifies the moment in which language fails as the differend, and explains it as follows: "...the unstable state and instant of language wherein something which must be able to be put into phrases cannot yet ...

    • Jean François Lyotard
    • France
    • 1983
    • Le Différend
  2. 22. Aug. 2022 · Focussing on Lyotard’s text ‘The Differend’, I show how its conceptual framework and philosophy of language locates the cause of deep disagreement not in the epistemic realm, but in things which do not fully submit to epistemic evaluation: the radically incomplete and open nature of language, and our increasingly politically ...

    • James Cartlidge
    • jkcartlidge92@googlemail.com
  3. Indeed, The Differend, arguable Lyotard’s most important statement to date, can be understood as a renewal of the sophistic (and specifically Gorgianic) view of invention. —

  4. differend. A wrong or injustice that arises because the discourse in which the wrong might be expressed does not exist. To put it another way, it is a wrong or injustice that arises because the prevailing or hegemonic discourse actively precludes the possibility of this wrong being expressed.

  5. 15. Mai 2019 · The differend : phrases in dispute. by. Lyotard, Jean François. Publication date. 1988. Topics. Philosophy. Publisher. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.

  6. This original study examines Jean-François Lyotard's philosophical concept of the differend and details its unexplored implications for literature. it provides a new framework with which to understand the discourse itself, from its Homeric beginnings to postmodern works by authors such as Michael Ondaatje and Jonathan Safran Foer.

  7. 110 Accesses. Abstract. Having now briefly examined the context of Lyotard’s work prior to the publication of The Differend, this chapter seeks to more thoroughly explore the book’s philosophical findings, particularly his concepts of the phrase, concatenation, the wrong, and most obviously the differend.