Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. The Kalam cosmological argument is a modern formulation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. It is named after the Kalam (medieval Islamic scholasticism), from which its key ideas originated.

  2. The Kalām Cosmological Argument is a 1979 book by the philosopher William Lane Craig, in which the author offers a contemporary defense of the Kalām cosmological argument and argues for the existence of God, with an emphasis on the alleged metaphysical impossibility of an infinite regress of past events. First, Craig argues that ...

    • William Lane Craig
    • 216
    • 1979
    • 1979
  3. 13. Juli 2004 · Influenced by the Neoplatonist John Philoponus (5th c) (Davidson 1969), the mutakallimūm—theologians who used reason and argumentation to support their revealed Islamic beliefs—developed the temporal version of the argument from the impossibility of an infinite regress, now referred to as the kalām cosmological argument. For ...

  4. Offers a refreshing discussion of the kalam cosmological argument; Advances a detailed critique of the argument based on the impossibility of an actual infinite; Presents a unique analysis of Platonism and of temporal becoming; Draws on very recent and first English translations previously unavailable to scholars

    • Jacobus Erasmus
  5. The Kalam Cosmological Argument. (1) Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence. (2) The universe has a beginning of its existence. Therefore: (3) The universe has a cause of its existence. (4) If the universe has a cause of its existence then that cause is God. Therefore: (5) God exists.

  6. 21. Okt. 2015 · The Kalām Cosmological Argument, the Big Bang, and Atheism. Published: 21 October 2015. Volume 31 , pages 323335, ( 2016 ) Cite this article. Download PDF. John J. Park. 1266 Accesses. 3 Citations. Explore all metrics. Abstract.

  7. 9. Juli 2015 · The medieval kalām argument is but one in a family of cosmological arguments that reasons from some aspect of the world to the existence of a fundamentally different sort of being in God, whose exercise of causal power accounts for the relevant phenomenon in need of explanation.