Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
26. Apr. 2024 · Thomas C. Schelling was an American economist who shared the 2005 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences with Robert J. Aumann. Schelling specialized in the application of game theory to cases in which adversaries must repeatedly interact, especially in international trade, treaties, and conflicts. The
Vor 4 Tagen · Bei der psychologischen Analyse von Abschreckungspolitik ist zwischen einer eher passiven und einer aktiven Form der Abschreckung zu differenzieren, die Thomas Schelling (1976, S. 78–80) mit dem Begriffspaar deterrence/compellence – verstanden als Abschreckung bzw. Zwangsanwendung – umschrieben hat. Demnach zielt Abschreckung
10. Mai 2024 · This chapter deals with the basic outlines of Schelling’s conception of living nature. It had a profound influence on the development of biology, particulary in Germany, and many of its parts are highly inspirational to this day. The first part presents...
Vor einem Tag · In 2005, game theorists Thomas Schelling and Robert Aumann followed Nash, Selten, and Harsanyi as Nobel Laureates. Schelling worked on dynamic models, early examples of evolutionary game theory. Aumann contributed more to the equilibrium school, introducing equilibrium coarsening and correlated equilibria, and developing an extensive ...
10. Mai 2024 · Indeed, many of the world’s greatest thinkers, politicians, and communicators devoted their careers to understanding and reducing the threat — people like Thomas Schelling, Carl Sagan and even, in his later years, Albert Einstein. But since the end of the Cold War, the nuclear expert has all but disappeared. And that’s a problem.
Vor einem Tag · Nuclear strategy involves the development of doctrines and strategies for the production and use of nuclear weapons . As a sub-branch of military strategy, nuclear strategy attempts to match nuclear weapons as means to political ends. In addition to the actual use of nuclear weapons whether in the battlefield or strategically, a large part of ...
8. Mai 2024 · They tend to form the default orientation of “hard-headed” thinking about international relationships today. Brute force aimed the smaller states was usually not necessary because, as Thomas Schelling (2008, 3) put it
