Suchergebnisse
Suchergebnisse:
1. Nov. 2014 · The Who, What, and Why of Human Intelligence Gathering: Self-Reported Measures of Interrogation Methods. Authors: Allison D Redlich. George Mason University. Christopher E. Kelly. Saint Joseph's...
In diesem Kapitel sollen Akteure des Intelligence Gathering, die für dieses Buch von Relevanz sind, beschrieben werden. Auch deren Ziele werden erörtert. 4.1 Nachrichtendienste . Die Möglichkeiten der Nachrichtendienste, an Informationen zu gelangen, sind vielfältig.
- Alexander Tsolkas, Friedrich Wimmer
- 2013
To understand recent trends in digital intelligence gathering by governments, we will utilise the framework of a widely recognised standard to explain how information is gathered and used, overtly and covertly: the ‘Intelligence Cycle’. Planning and direction.
This chapter discusses various techniques involved in intelligence gathering and interrogation. Such tactics may vary in scope and severity, depending largely on the party doing the interrogation and the setting, in both the political and geographical sense. It discusses human intelligence gathering and the types of sources. Sources are ...
- Current Research
- Design
- Procedure
- Interviews
- Challenge.
- Closure.
- Free account.
- Probed questioning.
- Probed questioning.
- Free account.
- Blame Questions
- Information Revealed
Below we report an empirical evaluation of MCI and CCE techniques for human intelligence-gathering, comparing them to adapted versions of each, which we refer to as Framed-MCI and Framed-CCE. In the adapted versions, each information-gathering request is preceded by a positive responsibility frame that explic-itly highlights personal responsibiliti...
Participants were assigned to either CCE or MCI interview groups. Each group was further subdivided into Framed or Unframed groups, giving four interview conditions. Key dependent measures included the number of participants in each condition who yielded target information (i.e., the information they were incentivized to withhold), the number of in...
In the experiment, participants witnessed a staged accident during a classroom session in which a laptop computer fell from a table as it was being moved by two confederates, one posing as a researcher and the other posing as a student taking part as a study participant. The event was designed to set up conditions under which participants would, in...
Irrespective of condition, all interviews comprised the same number of discrete phases (5 in total) in the same order: a) explain and build rapport, b) free account, c) probed questioning, d) challenge, and e) closure. The interview protocols differed as a function of condition in the free account and the probed question-ing only. The remaining pha...
This was the last of the information gathering phases of all interviews where, irrespective of information yield and/or interview performance, interviewees were verbally chal-lenged concerning the completeness of the account given thus far, and “pushed” for more information: I think I have a fair understanding of what has happened, but I am not sur...
This final phase marked the end of the interview. Here the interviewer explained that the interview had now finished and thanked the participant for taking part and for explaining how the laptop was damaged. The participant was offered the oppor-tunity to ask any questions. The recording device was turned off.
This phase is the initial information gathering phase of the interview. Participants were first asked the following two blame questions (verbatim) a) who was to blame for the damage to the laptop and b) was anyone else involved. Once these questions had been answered, the participant was asked to provide a detailed account of what had happened, ver...
Each segment mirrored that described in the MCI probed questioning but was preceded by a shorted rein-forcement of the framed persuasion message that had been deliv-ered at the start of the free account as described above.
This phase of the CCE interviews com-prised four information-gathering segments concerning people, actions, verbal and mistakes. People involved. “Describe to me absolutely everything about everyone involved in the damage to the laptop. I know this will be really hard for you, but can you try and provide as much detail as possible because I was not...
The second phase of interviews in this condi-tion commenced with the interviewer providing the same posi-tively framed moral rationale as to why the participant ought to fully explain what had occurred as in the Framed-MCI (above). From then on, the protocol mirrored that of the CCE condition.
At the commencement and end of the free account phase of all interviews, participants were asked two blame questions: a) who was to blame for the damage to the laptop and b) was anyone else involved. All participants complied with the experimenter instruc-tions by replying “the researcher” and “no”, respectively.
Verbatim transcripts of the interviews were coded for the overall total amount of event information provided, which was then clas-sified as target or nontarget information. For the purposes of this research, target information is defined as being any information concerning or indicating the presence and/or involvement of an-other person other than ...
23. Dez. 2019 · PDF | Every day, U.S. intelligence agencies gather huge amounts of information from a variety of sources. Collection of information is an essential part... | Find, read and cite all the...
24. März 2021 · View PDF View EPUB. This chapter first describes the importance of secret intelligence in protecting the public from terrorist attacks. The use of intelligence in deriving the strategic aim of the integrated U.K. counter-terrorism strategy, CONTEST, and supporting its delivery is examined. The ethical issues associated with the ...