Yahoo Suche Web Suche

Suchergebnisse

  1. Suchergebnisse:
  1. 3. Dez. 2023 · I think "See also" is clearly more common than "Also see" in this context. My question is whether "Also see" should be regarded as incorrect. My interpretation of the syntax is that the heading starts a sentence of sorts, where the items that follow are proper nouns, and that "Also see" is an incorrect way to start such a sentence ...

  2. Viele übersetzte Beispielsätze mit "see also list" – Deutsch-Englisch Wörterbuch und Suchmaschine für Millionen von Deutsch-Übersetzungen.

  3. 6. Sept. 2023 · There are six supporting signals: [no signal] E.g., Accord. See also. Cf. The most frequently used are probably [no signal], E.g., See, and See Also. [no signal] No signal is necessary if a cited authority: directly states the proposition; identifies the source of a direct quotation; or. identifies the source referred to in the text. E.g.,

  4. 3. Sept. 2015 · cf. is usually an invitation to the reader to 'compare' with another source; which may not even have the same subject matter, let alone agree. (derived from Latin: 'conferre'). So it's not that different from 'see also' in current usage. 'See', on the other hand, does suggest a supporting citation. – JHCL.

  5. 12. Jan. 2017 · See, and See Also. 12 January 201713 April 2017 SBLPress Notes and Bibliography. It is common for authors to refer readers to additional resources in footnotes. Following CMS §14.37, we encourage authors doing so to distinguish between the terms see or see also and the abbreviation cf. (Latin confer ).

  6. 29. März 2019 · In this example the first three verses contain the quote exactly while the following four citations are verses with a similar meaning. I know of some parenthetical citation abbreviations like "e.g." and "cf." Does anything similar exist for "see also"?

  7. 16. März 2011 · #1. Hello! I have a question regarding a expression that is very often present in footnotes. When we are informed to see other chapters, books, etc. about a subject, which is the correct expression: see also or also see ? e.g.: See also Parker, John. The theory and .... or. Also see Parker, John. The theory and .... |. Thank you in advance!